StanChart's executive remuneration policy questioned

Tuesday 23rd July 2019 15:03 EDT

The head of the British parliament’s Work and Pensions Committee has questioned Standard Chartered Bank's executive pension pay levels after more than a third of shareholders voted against its directors’ remuneration policy. Committee Chairman Frank Field asked in the letter why the remuneration committee put forward a proposal where the existing directors would receive 40% of base salary (20% of total salary) as the pension contribution whereas the contribution of new executive directors is limited to 10% of total salary. The letter also questioned whether the remuneration committee supported the Investment Association’s guideline that pension contribution rates for executive directors should be aligned with that of their workforce and enquired if the remuneration committee planned to revisit the executive pay policy next year.

Some 36% of StanChart’s shareholders voted against the bank’s 2019 directors’ remuneration report at its annual shareholder meeting in London, which set out plans to increase Chief Executive Bill Winters’ pension allowance among other measures. The bank failed to cap pension contributions as a percentage of base salary, instead calculating against a bigger total salary base which annoyed its investors.

The letter from Field closed by asking whether the remuneration committee shared the views of Winters where the chief executive called investors “immature” for voting against his pay package. Winters and remuneration committee Chair Christine Hodgson said earlier they believed the pension allowances paid to executives were in line with British corporate governance codes, even though the bank’s definition of basic salary includes fixed-pay allowances paid in shares as well as cash salary.

comments powered by Disqus

to the free, weekly Asian Voice email newsletter