Islamists in this country, and frankly around the world, have strategically been working hard for the past few decades to get western nations to embrace various aspects of Sharia, but under disguise. Their first foundation stone in achieving this has been to systematically promote the idea of ‘Islamophobia’, and to that extent, in the UK with appeasement by politicians they have engineered acorrupt definition of ‘Islamophobia’.
Readers may wonder how on earth has this come about. And to what extent they need to worry about the consequences of living with such a definition of Islamophobia should it ever become law?
I encourage you all to read and understand the definition as set out by the APPG British Muslims that is broadly led by Labour MPs. In my opinion it is a corrupt piece of work that is designed solely to protect Islamists from any inquiry, or challenge,and in stopping anyone wishing to express their opinions. In effect, they want it in law so they can stifle citizens from ever raising any issue related to Islam, Islamists or anything that is done in its name.
Did you know that some 52 councils have already adopted this definition of Islamophobia? You will not be too surprised when I tell you that 34 of these are Labour run councils. 9 where there is no overall control (NOC). There are 5 more that are run by the Liberal Democrats (LD), and 4 that are Tory led councils.
Basically, 65% of the councils that have adopted this definition of Islamophobia are Labour. If you add to that the NOC and LD councils, then this percentage rises to 92%. Yes folks, 92% of the councils adopting this very controversial definition are on the left of British politics.
So far, the saving grace for the nation has been the Conservative Government that rejected it outright. Stating that the definition in its current form is unfit for purpose.
So why should we all be worried? We should be worried because the Labour Party and its politicians are in tune with the Islamists who wish this definition to become universally adopted, and to also make it part of the law. Keir Starmer has NOT ruled it out. Maybe because his party has already adopted the definition since 2019.
Charles Moore,the former editor of the Daily Telegraph and The Spectatorin his forward to the Cavitasreport titled, ‘Islamophobia’ revisited, says: ‘To argue that criticism of Muslim ideas is a form of racism is, in most cases, a profound mistake. If the APPG definition of Islamophobia were to prevail, our society would cease to put all religions on the same footing and would empower those unrepresentative Muslim leaders who are keenest to silence critics. Britain should not admit a blasphemy law by the back door (or by the front!)’.
The writer of the report, Hardeep Singh who is a freelance journalist, Deputy-Director for the Network of Sikh Organisations and AssistantEditor of The Sikh Messenger, asks a very basic question, who gets to qualify and decide on the ‘Muslimness’ of any individual?
He cites evidence from Hansard:
‘The use of the term ‘Muslimness’ begs the question: who will be the arbiter of this? What about those Muslims who, to echo Baroness Falkner and Counter Extremism Commissioner Sara Khan,are thought by other Muslims to be ‘insufficiently Muslim’?
I would urge you all to read this report. It provides a good starting point in understanding some of the issues emerging, and the nature of this corrupt definition and how it can potentially undermine the very fabric of this nation.
Today we are facing an enemy that has infiltrated the Labour Party and through them, the corridors of power. They have managed to get intelligent politicians to agree to a definition that would in any other sphere be thrown out as a scam. Increasingly this same definition is being adopted by some of our educational institutions. I am sure you can all see where this is going.
The definition relies on the term ‘Muslimness’. It’s an attempt to connect ethnicity with religion. A concept that defies the very construct of race relations law in this country.
I have spoken to many people from various faiths and backgrounds. Interestingly many said to me:
‘But I have a legitimate rational fear of Islamists – so how can they then label me as Islamophobic?’
Just when we thought blasphemy laws were confined to the dustbin of history, it seems there are some who have found a backdoor way to bring them back. I have asked Keir Starmer to confirm if it is the intent of a possible Labour government to introduce this definition of Islamophobia into law. So far, he and the Labour Party have shied away from being open and honest. At our peril we allow this attack on British values. Think long and hard before you put that cross on that ballot paper.