So a Law trainee, having received a subsidised western education, is let off by his PC employer thus upholding our western tradition of his right of freedom to speak privately, even using a derogatory term for non Muslims accusing that the minds of the moderates from his community are colonised by the west.
If he disagrees with the western perspective which the majority of his brethren (Malala included) living in multicultural and tolerant UK find appealing, perhaps he would be better off working for Boko Haram or as spokesman for IS. At least this way the prospective Kaffur clients may get impartial advice which is untainted by religious zeal from that firm
The PM is absolutely right to send letter to the heads of mosques urging them to explain how Islam can be part of British identity. It was also interesting to see a Labour politician walking off a live TV interview when questions were raised about the letter. Was it because any untoward comments may harm their chances of getting votes from their biggest support group?
The choice for voters especially from the reminder tolerant religious background who are fully assimilated in the British society in the next election would be similar to the one faced by the Indians and as we know, the verdict was handed down resoundingly.
A mere visit to listen to tragic stories of the Kashmiri pandits exodus does not qualify a Labour politician whose party empowers the other group in the blind pursuit of seeking votesto understand the concerns of the Hindus.
Many a professional friends and family members I come across feel the same and it is about time we say it with our votes remembring that Congress = Labour!
Bharat Parmar
By email
